Calculators
Coverage adequacy score API
Score insurance coverage adequacy 0-100 from a transparent weighted rubric with EXPLICIT weights (coverage ratio 0.60, emergency fund 0.20, debt protection 0.20), returning a rating (well covered → critically underinsured), the coverage gap, and a per-factor breakdown so the score is auditable. Answers 'am I underinsured', 'coverage adequacy score', 'how well am I covered', 'insurance coverage gap'.
Price$0.01per request
MethodPOST
Route/v1/calc/ins-coverage-adequacy-score
StatusLive
MIME typeapplication/json
Rate limit120/minute
CacheNo cache
calcinsurancecoverageadequacyscorerubricunderinsuredplanning
API URL
Integration docshttps://x402.hexl.dev/v1/calc/ins-coverage-adequacy-scoreExample request
{
"currentCoverage": 300000,
"recommendedCoverage": 500000,
"emergencyFundMonths": 3,
"debtToCoverageRatio": 0.3
}Example response
{
"method": "coverage-adequacy rubric",
"adequacyScore": 60,
"scale": "0-100 (higher = better)",
"rating": "underinsured",
"coverageGap": 200000,
"weights": {
"coverage": 0.6,
"emergencyFund": 0.2,
"debt": 0.2
},
"breakdown": [
{
"factor": "coverage ratio",
"value": 0.6,
"weight": 0.6,
"contribution": 36
},
{
"factor": "emergency fund",
"value": 0.5,
"weight": 0.2,
"contribution": 10
},
{
"factor": "debt protection",
"value": 0.7,
"weight": 0.2,
"contribution": 14
}
]
}Input schema
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"currentCoverage",
"recommendedCoverage"
],
"properties": {
"currentCoverage": {
"type": "number",
"examples": [
300000
]
},
"recommendedCoverage": {
"type": "number",
"examples": [
500000
]
},
"emergencyFundMonths": {
"type": "number",
"examples": [
3
],
"description": "default 3"
},
"debtToCoverageRatio": {
"type": "number",
"examples": [
0.3
],
"description": "0..1, lower is better"
}
}
}Output schema
{
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": true
}